اكتشف أين تغوص، ومتى تذهب، وما الذي يمكن أن تراه.

اكتشف أين تغوص، ومتى تذهب، وما الذي يمكن أن تراه.
★
القائمة
الوجهات مواقع الغوص الحياة البحرية حطام السفن الأخبار
خطّط لرحلة مخطّط الرحلات أفضل أوقات الغوص حاسبة التكاليف مقارنات تقويم الحياة البحرية درجة حرارة الماء الليفبوردات المشغّلون والمنتجعات المحميات البحرية غرف الضغط العالي خريطة العالم
الغوص في الكهوف جميع غطسات الكهوف الوجهات ومواقع الغوص أنظمة الكهوف والخرائط التدريب والمؤهلات مراكز الغوص والمرشدون المعدات والتكنولوجيا أبحاث السلامة والحوادث العلوم والتاريخ والحفاظ على البيئة الموارد والتحديثات
المناطق أستراليا، نيوزيلندا وشرق آسياالبحر الكاريبي وغرب المحيط الأطلسيأوروبا والأطلسي والمتوسطالمحيط الهندي وشرق أفريقياجزر المحيط الهادئ وميكرونيزياالبحر الأحمر والشرق الأوسطجنوب شرق آسيا ومثلث الشعاب المرجانيةالأمريكتان والمحيط الهادئ الشرقي الدول
التعلّم والأدوات جميع الأدلة الشهادات أدلة المعدات مقاطع فيديو استفسر عن البيانات وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي API
حول من نحن المنهجية إخلاء المسؤولية تواصل معنا
عرضك
★ محفوظ

وجهاتك وموقعك ومواقع الأنواع المحفوظة بالنجوم، مخزّنة في هذا المتصفح.

API GATEWAY

وصول JSON مجاني للقراءة فقط إلى البيانات المخزّنة في الأطلس.

الوضع الداكن

عرض المرشد
جديد على الغطس؟ الأعماق والتيارات ومستويات الشهادات؟ نشرح كل مصطلح أثناء تصفّحك بلغة واضحة. نفس البيانات، مع الشرح مدمجاً.

عرض الخبراء
أنت تعرف أصلًا الفرق بين الجدار وال drift dive. إليك البيانات فقط: واضحة وسريعة ومختصرة. هذا هو العرض الافتراضي.

لغة الواجهة

المعدات

Rebreathers in Caves: How They Differ, the Bailout Concept and What Training Involves

7 دقيقة قراءة6 مصادرتم التحقق 2026-10-14

Closed-circuit rebreathers let cave divers stay longer on far less gas, but they add failure modes that open-circuit divers never face. This article explains the differences, the idea of open-circuit bailout and what research and consensus statements say about risk and training.

تعليمي، لا تدريبي. هذا الدليل يشرح المفاهيم. إنه ليس خطة غوص، ولا إجراءً، ولا بديلاً عن التدريب تحت إشراف.

A closed-circuit rebreather (CCR) recycles the diver's exhaled gas: it removes carbon dioxide with a chemical absorbent and adds oxygen to replace what the body has used, so very little gas leaves the system as bubbles [2]. Rebreathers have become common in technical and cave diving because they make long, deep dives possible on small cylinders. They also change the nature of the risk, and cave training for rebreather divers is built around that change. This article explains the concepts; it is not a description of rebreather procedures, which must be learned on a specific unit from a qualified instructor.

How a CCR differs from open circuit

With open-circuit scuba, every breath is drawn from a cylinder and exhaled into the water. Gas supply is the limiting factor, and the gas in the cylinder has a fixed, known composition. With a CCR, the gas the diver breathes is a mixture constantly adjusted by the machine and the diver. Its oxygen level is measured by sensors and controlled by electronics, a manual valve or both; its carbon dioxide is removed by a scrubber whose capacity is finite.

The benefits for cave diving are clear. Potts, Buzzacott and Denoble note that rebreathers let divers stay underwater longer without carrying additional tanks [2], and the 2023 Rebreather Forum 4 consensus describes CCRs as widely adopted by technical divers to reduce gas consumption and extend depth and duration [3]. Exley noted in 1979 that exhaled bubbles can dislodge silt from a cave ceiling [6]; a rebreather that recycles its gas releases far fewer bubbles, although we found no study quantifying the effect in caves.

The trade-off is complexity. The Rebreather Forum 4 statement describes rebreathers as technologically complex with many failure points, and their use as apparently associated with a higher accident rate than open-circuit scuba [3]. The most serious failures do not announce themselves. Too little oxygen (hypoxia), too much (hyperoxia) and a build-up of carbon dioxide (hypercapnia) can each impair or incapacitate a diver, and these three appear among the stated causes in an analysis of 181 recreational rebreather deaths between 1998 and 2010 [1].

What the fatality research says

Andrew Fock's 2013 analysis in Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine estimated that recreational rebreather deaths occurred at several times the rate of open-circuit recreational diving, with figures ranging from about four to ten times depending on assumptions [1]. His fault-tree comparison found that a CCR on its own carries roughly 25 times the risk of a critical component failure of a manifolded twin-cylinder open-circuit system, but that this risk can be offset by carrying redundant open-circuit bailout [1]. Two-thirds of the deaths were associated with a high-risk dive or high-risk behaviour, including starting or continuing dives with alarms sounding or known faults, and Fock identified many points in the human-machine interface where errors could lead to a fatality [1]. No particular brand or type of unit was over-represented [1].

Cave-specific data are thinner. In the review of trained cave divers who died in the United States between 1985 and 2015, the number using rebreathers rose from one in the first 15 years to six or seven in the second (the paper's text and table differ slightly), an increase that was not statistically significant given the small numbers [2]. Individual cases illustrate the failure modes: one diver had not opened the valve of his rebreather's oxygen cylinder, and another is thought to have used a unit with out-of-date oxygen sensors and a malfunctioning solenoid [2]. The authors noted that the classic cave diving rules were written before rebreathers and do not specifically address them [2].

The first recreational production CCR is dated to 1997 by Potts and colleagues and to 1998 by Fock [1][2]; Potts and colleagues add that rebreathers soon became popular with technical divers, including cave divers [2].

The bailout concept

Because a rebreather can fail in ways the diver cannot fix underwater, rebreather divers carry an independent way to breathe, called bailout. In most cave diving this means open-circuit cylinders carried alongside the rebreather, enough to get the diver out. Fock's analysis showed why this matters: with redundant open-circuit bailout included, the modelled risk of a mission-critical equipment failure becomes similar to that of an open-circuit diver who depends on several cylinders to complete a decompression dive [1].

In a cave, the exit can be long, and bailout must be planned for the worst place to have a problem, the farthest point of the dive. Training standards state this directly. GUE's CCR Cave standards require divers always to have enough bailout gas to exit the cave from the maximum penetration [4]. The NSS Cave Diving Section's CCR Cave Diver course requires open-circuit bailout with a margin over what is needed to exit from maximum penetration, carried as two or more cylinders or a single cylinder with a dual-outlet (H) valve [5]. The NSS-CDS notes that many students first complete its open-circuit Apprentice Cave course, partly to learn how much open-circuit gas an exit really requires [5]. How bailout is calculated is taught in those courses and is not reproduced here.

The Rebreather Forum 4 consensus statements add related points: a bailout valve (a mouthpiece that can switch from loop to open circuit) can ease the transition in some emergencies but needs a high-performance open-circuit supply, mouthpiece-retaining straps help prevent drowning if a diver loses consciousness, and practices around bailout rebreathers (a second rebreather carried as bailout) should be developed and documented [3].

Training implications

Rebreather cave training sits on top of two separate foundations: rebreather competence and cave competence. The NSS-CDS CCR Cave Diver course requires rebreather certification, at least 50 logged dives and at least 25 dives and 35 hours on the same rebreather that will be used [5]. GUE requires its CCR technical certification on the same configuration, 50 non-training dives on that configuration and 25 non-training dives at its second cave level [4]. GUE's course topics include risks specific to rebreather diving in an overhead environment, equipment configuration, and exits in zero visibility while monitoring the unit by its head-up display [4].

Rebreather cave divers still carry the full cave kit. Both agencies require one primary and two backup lights, a primary reel per team, safety spools or reels and line markers on their rebreather cave courses [4][5].

Broader rebreather research points to human factors as much as hardware. Fock recommended checklists and designs that reduce opportunities for error, and suggested that initial training should build core skills before more complex options are introduced [1]. Rebreather Forum 4 endorsed brief pre-entry checklists (for example confirming the unit is switched on and the oxygen cylinder is open), head-up displays for safety-critical information, refresher training because skills fade, and reporting of incidents and near-misses to DAN; it also stated that solo diving may increase the likelihood of a fatality during a rebreather incident [3].

Summary

Rebreathers give cave divers range and duration, but they replace a simple, robust breathing system with a complex one whose failures can be silent. The cave diving response is layered: an independent bailout sized for the exit, the same lights and line equipment as any cave diver, rigorous checks, and training that first builds rebreather experience and then applies it to the overhead environment.

المصادر: [1] Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine 43(2):78-85 (Andrew W. Fock) ↗[2] Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine 46(3):150-154 (Potts, Buzzacott, Denoble) ↗[3] Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine 53(2):142-146 (Mitchell, Pollock) ↗[4] Global Underwater Explorers ↗[5] NSS Cave Diving Section ↗[6] Cave Diving Section of the National Speleological Society (author: Sheck Exley) ↗ · تم التحقق 2026-10-14
كل حقيقة في هذه الصفحة مع مصدرها (15)
حقيقةالحالةالمصدر
A rebreather recycles exhaled gas by removing carbon dioxide and topping up metabolised oxygen, letting divers stay longer without extra tanks. موثق [2]
Rebreather Forum 4 describes rebreathers as technologically complex with many failure points and apparently associated with a higher accident rate than open-circuit scuba.2023 consensus. موثق [3]
Fock's analysis of 181 recreational rebreather deaths 1998-2010 lists hypoxia, hyperoxia and hypercapnia among stated causes.31 percent of cases had scant data. موثق [1]
Fock estimated CCR use is associated with a four- to ten-fold increased risk of death compared with recreational open-circuit diving.Abstract gives about 10 times; conclusion gives four to ten times; rebreather user numbers are uncertain. موثق [1]
Fock found CCRs have about a 25-fold increased risk of component failure compared with a manifolded twin-cylinder open-circuit system, offset by carrying bailout.Fault-tree model with estimated failure probabilities. موثق [1]
Two-thirds of the rebreather deaths analysed were associated with a high-risk dive or high-risk behaviour. موثق [1]
Among trained US cave diver fatalities, rebreather users rose from one (first 15-year period) to six or seven (second period), not statistically significant.Paper text says one to seven; Table 2 lists 1 and 6 (overall 8). Small numbers. المصادر متضاربة [2]
Potts et al. date the first production recreational CCR to 1997; Fock dates the introduction of recreational CCRs to 1998.One-year difference, possibly release versus market availability. المصادر متضاربة [1] [2]
GUE CCR Cave standards require sufficient bailout gas to exit from maximum penetration at all times.Section 3.2.16.4(d). موثق [4]
The NSS-CDS CCR Cave course requires open-circuit bailout of at least 150 percent of the gas needed to exit from maximum penetration, as two or more cylinders or one with an H-valve. موثق [5]
NSS-CDS CCR Cave requires rebreather certification, 50 logged dives and at least 25 dives and 35 hours on the same rebreather. موثق [5]
GUE CCR Cave requires CCR-T1 certification on the same configuration, 50 non-training CCR-T1 dives and 25 non-training Cave 2 dives. موثق [4]
RF4 endorsed pre-entry checklists, HUDs for safety-critical information, mouthpiece-retaining straps, refresher training and incident reporting, and stated solo diving may increase fatality likelihood during a rebreather incident. موثق [3]
Fock recommended checklists and error-reducing design and suggested staged rebreather training. موثق [1]
Exley listed air bubbles dislodging silt from the ceiling among causes of sudden silting.Page 9. موثق [6]

موثق: مُصرَّح به من مصدر رسمي أو أولي فتحناه. مُبلَّغ عنه: من مصدر ثانوي فقط. المصادر متضاربة: تتضمن الملاحظة النسختين. قد يكون قديماً: أحدث مصدر وجدناه قديم.

مكتوب بأسلوبنا الخاص من المصادر أعلاه. الإبلاغ عن تصحيح

أستراليا، نيوزيلندا وشرق آسيا

Cairns & the Ribbon ReefsNingaloo ReefCoral Sea & Osprey ReefOkinawa & the Kerama IslandsPoor Knights IslandsTownsville & the YongalaGreen IslandIzu Peninsula

البحر الكاريبي وغرب المحيط الأطلسي

BonaireCozumelRiviera Maya & the CenotesBelize Barrier ReefGrand CaymanIsla Mujeres & CancúnRoatánTiger Beach & Grand Bahama

أوروبا والأطلسي والمتوسط

Malta & GozoSilfra & IcelandThe AzoresCanary IslandsLarnaca & the ZenobiaScapa FlowArctic NorwayMadeira

المحيط الهندي وشرق أفريقيا

North & South Malé AtollsAri AtollBaa Atoll & Hanifaru BayAliwal Shoal & UmkomaasMafia IslandMauritiusSeychellesSodwana Bay

جزر المحيط الهادئ وميكرونيزيا

PalauChuuk (Truk) LagoonFakaravaKona, HawaiʻiRangiroaTaveuni & Rainbow ReefBeqa Lagoon & Pacific HarbourEspiritu Santo

البحر الأحمر والشرق الأوسط

Sharm El Sheikh & Ras MohammedBrothers, Daedalus & St John'sDahabHurghada & El GounaMarsa Alam & the Deep SouthAqabaDaymaniyat IslandsMusandam Peninsula

جنوب شرق آسيا ومثلث الشعاب المرجانية

Bali & Nusa PenidaKomodoRaja AmpatSipadan & MabulAnilaoCoronKoh TaoLembeh Strait

الأمريكتان والمحيط الهادئ الشرقي

Galápagos IslandsCocos IslandFlorida KeysSea of Cortez & Cabo PulmoSocorro & the RevillagigedosBritish ColumbiaCalifornia Channel IslandsCosta Rica Pacific Coast